Howard Dean, Judge, Jury, MD, Lunatic

After Millions of dollars spent investigating the Plame "leak," with nothing to show for it but one indictment for making false statements, we learn today that in fact Karl Rove did it. We learn this from Howard Dean in the New York Times coverage of Rove's speech to a room full of "nervous Republicans."

"Rove's political standing gets him an invitation to address Republicans in Washington, D.C., today, but it doesn't give him the credibility to question Democrats' commitment to national security," Mr. Dean said. "The truth is, Karl Rove breached our national security for partisan gain and that is both unpatriotic and wrong." (emphasis added)

If Howard Dean has information proving his allegations against Rove, why didn't he give this information to the special prosecutor? If Dean has this proof and didn't give it to the special prosecutor, why isn't he facing charges for impeding and investigation?

Since the special prosecutor hasn't filed any charges against Rove, why doesn't the Times mention that fact after Dean's baseless accusation?

Posted by: Stephen Macklin at 03:49 PM | No Comments | Add Comment