August 06, 2005

The New York Times Disgusts Me

Damien Cave writing in the New York Times asks the question “Where are the war heroes?” Then in the lead paragraphs provides the answer.

ONE soldier fought off scores of elite Iraqi troops in a fierce defense of his outnumbered Army unit, saving dozens of American lives before he himself was killed. Another soldier helped lead a team that killed 27 insurgents who had ambushed her convoy. And then there was the marine who, after being shot, managed to tuck an enemy grenade under his stomach to save the men in his unit, dying in the process.
Their names are Sgt. First Class Paul R. Smith, Sgt. Leigh Ann Hester and Sgt. Rafael Peralta. If you have never heard of them, even in a week when more than 20 marines were killed in Iraq by insurgents, that might be because the military, the White House and the culture at large have not publicized their actions with the zeal that was lavished on the heroes of World War I and World War II.
The rest of the piece goes on to lament that the military has not done enough to put its heroes into the spotlight. Conveniently ignoring how critical the press and the rest of left would be if they did so.

Here is the sort of thing Cave seems to wish were happening.

Richard I. Bong, for example, an Army Air Corps pilot who came to be known as the Ace of Aces, was sent home in December 1944 after shooting down his 40th Japanese plane. He was dispatched immediately on a nationwide tour to help sell war bonds.
Audie Murphy, perhaps the best-known World War II hero, took part in similar tours. He went on to act in 44 Hollywood films, including his own autobiography, “To Hell and Back.” Dozens of other combat heroes played roles in the war's promotion.
News flash for Mr. Cave. This is not 1943 and we are not fighting World War II. It's a different war in a different world. Cave and his editors at the Times don't seem to grasp this simple fact. Their caption under one photo reads:
Audie Murphy in “To Hell and Back,” the 1955 movie in which he plays himself, the war hero. The Iraq war is not producing such stars.
What Cave carefully never addresses is the role of the media in the lack of publically recognized heroes. Remember Sgt First Class Paul R Smith? He was mentioned in the opening of Cave's piece. the headline on the Times article about Smith reads
Medal of Honor to Be Awarded to Soldier Killed in Iraq, a First
The full article is in the archive but according to the information provided with the abstract, the article appeared on March 30, 2005 and was printed in the “Late Edition - Final , Section A , Page 13 , Column 1.” The Times prints a story about the first Medal of Honor given in the War on Terror on page 13 and one of their writers has the gall to ask why there are no public heroes.

There are no public heroes because the media do not want there to be heroes. Heroes rally support for the military and and the war. Neither of which the Times wants supported.


More Here at ShrinkWrapped

Posted by: Stephen Macklin at 03:28 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment


1 Sgt. Paul Smith, Medal of Honor winner, makes page 13 of the New York Times and Mr. Cave wonders why there are no heros? There are but you will never find them in the Times unless you look on the back pages. This is the same paper that had Walter Duranty as a reporter. Mr. Duranty reported from Moscow during the 1930's that there was no suppression, killing or planned starvation in the Ukraine while 10 million were being murdered by the NKGB. He and the Times won a Pulitzer for the lies and to this day the Times won't give the Pulitzer up. This is the paper that calls the killers of children, women and innocents 'insurgents' rather than murdering terrorists. They modify and suppress news, they are more like the old "Disinformation Service" like the old Dept. #6 of the KGB rather than a 'news' organ. Their circulation continues to fall as they take the sides of our enemies in time of war and the people are noticing.

Posted by: Ron Norman at August 07, 2005 05:10 AM (e5htg)

2 Truly Orwellian drivel from the NY Times, but that's to be expected. I'm less understanding in regards to our feminized DoD. These people are supporting of same 'hall of mirrors' horse hockey as the NYT, and that is beyond my understanding.

I guess once you're inside the beltway, condescending elitism is a way of life. Screw them all.

God bless our warriors on the ground, because they are heros every day.

Posted by: Yeti at August 08, 2005 06:00 AM (x00hV)

3 Saying the NY Times doesn't want to publicize heroes because they don't want to support the war is dubious. Heroes equal eyeballs. In your cynical media world-view, they'd like the opportunity to promote genuine examples of Americans dying for no purpose.

The Army and the White House push and block things depending on what they're trying to accomplish. If they want the media to pay attention to certain things, they'll issue a blitz of statements for that purpose. So, why aren't they doing it for these heroes? I think that's what the article is trying to say.

And things like, "God bless our warriors on the ground, because they are heros every day," make me puke. They're just people, doing their jobs.

Posted by: Ben at August 15, 2005 11:17 AM (+DAqB)

4 So the media in general and the NYT specifically should only report what the government wants them to?

Hardly a recipe for a free press.

If the NYT wanted there to be a public hero - they would make it happen.

Posted by: Stephen Macklin at August 15, 2005 01:50 PM (ics4u)

5 Or make one up Like they tried to manufacture "war hero" Kerry , along with his help ...... I must need a break from the news,
The surrender of the Gaza strip has had me particurlarly discouraged lately . Mayby thats why my subconcience kicks in I had a dream last night , I was watching Saturday=nite live back when it was GOOD , Gildna Radner was on the news
and she was still wearing those sexy glasses.
GILDNA>>>>>>>>>>>"Whats this I hear about Surgeons in Iraq , blowing up people in cars and such???? , Sneaking around and killing innocent
People !!!!!! "Im not standing for this and you shouldnt either" " Why I always thought these surgeons were supposed to save people and sew them up and stuff ? This makes me , no end of angr "....................... " Whaaaaat ???"
" OHHHH!!!!" , " Never mind" .

Posted by: skinner at August 21, 2005 08:41 PM (IYV6S)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






28kb generated in 0.0629 seconds; 40 queries returned 182 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.